UPDATING OCCASIONALLY (FOR NOW)

9 thoughts on “558 – Cotton Clad Calamity”

  1. Raznaak

    Yup, he’s a bastard XD

  2. Dr. Norman (not a real doctor)

    Are those pajamas available in XXXL in the gift shop?

  3. Otaku

    It’s been a while, so let me ask: Did we get a reason for him to WANT Susie dead? Not to backseat, but if we didn’t, I’m worried were about to move into “Stupid Evil” territory. Now, stupid happens, don’t get me wrong. It’s not bad storytelling for that to be the case here.

    You’ve just done a good job NOT having that be a driving factor, so the “Kill off the stars of my successful reality TV show.” seems shortsighted, otherwise. Oh, I guess I could be mistaken about the in-story reality TV show’s success. Like, if the company behind them is losing money, or they think a change in management at the ranch would make the whole thing more popular/profitable, then I can see the above scenario happening as well.

    I REALLY think I’m just forgetting something important, but that I don’t have time to deep dive to remind me of, hence the comment. >_<

    1. Deoxy

      It certainly has been stretched out over quite a while, but there have definitely been hints from quite near the beginning that whoever is running the reality TV show definitely wants her dead.

      But I certainly don’t recall any reason why.

      1. Clint

        Yeah it’s fair to not remember since it’s been a hot minute (many, many minutes) but if you feel like a refresher the most relevant bits would be the beginning of Episode 8 and the end of Episode 15. We haven’t explicitly spelled out exactly what The Exec means by his “side hustle” or who was on the other end of that phone call, though.

        I’m hoping that when the whole thing is eventually available it will make sense, or at least enough sense to have hung this narrative on.

        1. Otaku

          Thanks for the replies, Deoxy and Clint. Yeah, I’d totally forgotten about those things. Good to know!

  4. Evervigilant

    Seems about time for the two people who aren’t there to make a surprise entrance as the ace Susie didn’t even know she had.

  5. Scarsdale

    There’s still 3-5 people on her side that might be planning something. This guy is a megalomaniac with a god complex, so letting him think he’s the sharpest tool in the shed sets him up for a fall. Everything depends on those cameras, and I suspect their little stop over by the charging coffins had something to do with her actual plan, not the one the a-hole thinks it is.

  6. lyra

    Really enjoyed the opening of Zombie Ranch. I like the combination of the western setting with the zombie concept, it gives the story a really distinctive atmosphere. I’m a freelance illustrator and animator, and I’d be interested in seeing how some of these scenes could translate into motion, especially as a short animated teaser or character scene.

    If you’re ever interested in something like that, you can reach me here:

    IG: eve_verse_
    Email: [contact.lilaclines@gmail.com](mailto:contact.lilaclines@gmail.com)
    Discord: Lyralilac_

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


 

558 – Cotton Clad Calamity
Posted on August 26, 2026 by Dawn

What would you call this? Armchair assassination? Merk-from-home?

Well, Suzie ain't dead (or undead) quite yet, so we'll just have to see if his gloating is justifiable.

Historical motivators…

Posted on October 19, 2016 by Clint

I’m a bit of a history buff. I feel like it’s a good trait in a writer, and not just if you’re someone looking to set your tale in a former time and place. I think it’s good research into human nature itself.

Does that sound strange? Maybe so, if your experience of history is defined as “that class that put me to sleep in school.” Someone rattling off lists of events and the dates they happened so you can regurgitate them onto a test every so often isn’t precisely compelling stuff. It’s much more compelling if you go beyond the dates and get into the details, and the trials and tribulations of the men and women involved. “What happened?” can be an interesting question, don’t get me wrong. “Why did it happen?” tends to fascinate me more. What was in the particular psychological makeup of a Robert E. Lee or Catherine the Great or Archimedes that, combined with the happenstances of the Universe, made things turn out the way they did?

Of particular note here are the failures. The decisions of notable people which we, looking back on them from our Comfortable Armchairs of Hindsight (+3?) , find to be logic-defying and, not to put too fine a point on it, just plain dumb. This is where the writer’s mind, or at least my writer’s mind, starts to speculate. In the absence of pure practicality, what motivators could have been in play to cause Robert E. Lee, a man up until then famous for not throwing away the lives of men under his command, to order a suicidal frontal charge on the Federal position at Gettysburg?

Certainly Shakespeare was no stranger to the idea of dramatizing the lives and key events of historical figures, to where their motives made internal sense to the play even if the motives he came up with happened to be completely fabricated — Richard III was no more a deformed hunchback than Napoleon was a midget, and yet to this day we’ll nod knowingly when someone looks at a power hungry guy who happens to be short and states, “he’s got a real Napoleon complex.” That’s the kind of guy who thinks he can invade Russia successfully in the Winter.

But it doesn’t have to be on that global a scale, does it? Micro begets macro and vice-versa. It’s well known in the annals of psychology that a certain smell might evoke feelings of happiness in one person and dread in another, based on past associations. Going further than that, think about a smell such as chocolate which tends to be considered pleasing by humanity at large. Having a character in your story who remarks on how pleasant they find the smell of chocolate is not nearly as interesting a moment as a character who has a bad reaction to it. The latter defies our logic, or at least our “conventional wisdom,” and so we’re naturally intrigued at the anomaly.

Well, I am, at least — and hey, they’re always saying that you should write the things you want to read. So I like weaving up those skeins of the past for my characters and letting them surface every so often in the form of behavior that doesn’t quite seem level-headed. You have to of course establish a baseline first, but sometimes it’s the inconsistencies in their behavior that actually brings them to life.